Charitable organizations rely on donor support to maintain their operations and engage in their missions. Numerous recent economic factors, from the COVID-19 pandemic to the highest rates of inflation seen in decades, have created considerable uncertainty in the world of philanthropic giving. Nonprofits are challenged to not only retain their existing donors but to also attract new ones. While federal tax laws provide incentives to encourage donors to give to charitable organizations, it is the responsibility of the charitable organization to provide the proper documentation to the donor as support. Failure to do so can be devastating. A recent decision from the U.S. Tax Court, Albrecht v. Commissioner, offers a stern reminder about organizations’ obligation to help their donors access the tax benefits that come from charitable donations.
Section 170 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) addresses tax deductions for charitable contributions. Subsection (c) provides a broad definition of “charitable contribution” to include donations of money or property to various organizations, including:
Subsection 170(f)(8) identifies situations when the IRS will not allow a deduction and establishes a “substantiation requirement” for contributions worth $250 or more.
For a charitable contribution of less than $250, a taxpayer only needs to keep records that can provide evidence of the contribution if requested by the IRS.
A donor may not claim a charitable tax deduction worth $250 or more unless they possess “contemporaneous written acknowledgment” (CWA) prepared by the donee. The statute defines “contemporaneous” to mean the earlier of:
The CWA must include the following information:
If, for example, a donor received a commemorative tote bag worth $8.99 in exchange for their $1,000 donation, the CWA must state this.
All CWA letters received should be kept with the donor’s tax records and easily accessible in the event of audit or other IRS examinations. Some donations, especially those of vehicles, art, and other tangible noncash items, require submission of the CWA and other appraisal documentation with the donor’s tax return.
The taxpayer in the Albrecht case, along with her late husband, “acquired a large collection of Native American jewelry and artifacts during their marriage.” She donated about 120 items from this collection to a New Mexico museum in December 2014. She and a museum representative signed a five-page “Deed of Gift” around the same time.
According to the Tax Court’s decision, the first page of the Deed of Gift stated that the taxpayer was donating the items “under the terms stated in the Conditions Governing Gifts to the Wheelwright Museum of the American Indian.” The second page stated these conditions, which included a stipulation that “the donation is unconditional and irrevocable…unless otherwise stated in the Gift Agreement.” The remaining pages identified the items included in the donation.
The taxpayer filed her 2014 federal income tax return and included a copy of the Deed of Gift. The IRS notified her that it was disallowing the deduction because the Deed of Gift did not meet the requirements for a CWA found in IRC § 170(f)(8). The taxpayer requested a review by the Tax Court.
The IRS argued that it denied the deduction because the Deed of Gift “did not specify whether the Wheelwright Museum provided any goods or services in return for the donation,” nor did it “state that it represented the entire agreement between the museum and [the taxpayer].” It noted that the Deed of Gift did not include the “Gift Agreement” referenced on the second page of the document, and argued that the reference to a separate agreement “creat[ed] ambiguity as to whether additional terms, including donee provision of goods or services, were part of the donation.”
The Tax Court stated that, when a CWA does not specify whether the taxpayer received anything from the donee, it must “look to the deed as a whole” to determine whether the taxpayer and donee exchanged anything for the donation. It agreed with the IRS’s assertion that the reference to a Gift Agreement made the Deed of Gift too ambiguous to meet the CWA requirements.
The court acknowledged the taxpayer’s “good faith attempt…to substantially comply with the [IRC] by executing the deed,” but held that it was not enough. The lesson for charitable organizations is to follow the requirements for a CWA under IRC § 170(f)(8) to the letter.
If you have any questions or would like additional information about anything mentioned, please comment below or email us at askus@lgt-cpa.com.